Search is now available for the website, it is getting massive.
Use this if you are looking for specific topics titles or use keywords like:
Climate, Democracy, Education
Pitch in
Your donation goes directly to essentials like printing literature, digital outreach, and community events. Even small amounts make a huge difference.
This campaign isn’t about me, it’s about us. It’s about proving that working people can take on wealthy interests and win. With your support, we can bring fresh ideas, accountability, and real representation to Congress.
Join in by donating Via our Website
Just do $1.00
The Curious Arrest of the President of the United States, Part One
Trump V. The United States - The ruling in Trump V. The United States was unconstitutional on three fronts:
1. The Supreme Court as previously discussed does not have the constitutional authority to review law for constitutionality.
Nor does it have the right to make law, as unelected officials. As there is no process defined within the constitution itself to allow them to do judicial review, they simply cannot do what we have allowed them to do for over 200 years.
a. This not only stands for Trump V. The United States, but as well all rulings the supreme court has made with its unconstitutional power over its 200+ years. Including rulings regarding; citizens united, voting rights, etc.
2. and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
This line in the U.S. constitution article two, section four is in complete contradiction the supreme court ruling on its face making the ruling unconstitutional. As I previously said, the term high crimes is a reference to felonies and criminal proceedings and process.
a. This line means the President of the United States of America must be accountable to the justice system.
3. This Violates Congresses Powers of investigation, in accordance with Article I, Section 8, Clause 18: “Although the power of inquiry was not expressly provided for in the Constitution, it has nonetheless been acknowledged as an essential and appropriate auxiliary to the legislative function derived implicitly from Article I’s vesting of legislative Powers in the Congress.”
a. The president being Immune form investigations for actions and duties carried out in his day to day, would render the notion that the power of congress no longer has the power of oversight, and constitutes a violation to separation of powers.
For that fraction of a percent
There are moments where I think some of these people would do anything, they wouldn't stop at anything. I believe, most of the time, that they will even attempt to stop society, all of civilization, from progressing forward in order to maintain their wealth. Look no further than the fossil fuel industry, literally on The Verge of war with Venezuela, most likely do to the vast sums of oil they have. The person who would be taking over Venezuela would be allowing American oil companies and others from America to come in and capitalize on the country. It is very unlikely that it has anything to do with drugs and everyone knows it, It’s not even a secret. They're willing to sacrifice our lives, just look at the health insurance industry. They play corporate death panel everyday deciding who lives who dies,
Proposed 29th Amendment: Opinion, Polling Data, and Local Support
The proposed “29th Amendment” aims to modernize and strengthen American governance by addressing a range of issues—campaign finance, government transparency, digital rights, and social welfare. Unlike more narrowly focused amendments, it takes a comprehensive approach, reflecting widespread voter frustration with entrenched interests and outdated structures. This broad scope can be both an asset and a challenge. However, when looking at public sentiment, there is plenty of optimism about many of these reforms and how they might reinvigorate democracy.