Trump V. The United States - The ruling in Trump V. The United States was unconstitutional on three fronts:

1. The Supreme Court as previously discussed does not have the constitutional authority to review law for constitutionality.

Nor does it have the right to make law, as unelected officials. As there is no process defined within the constitution itself to allow them to do judicial review, they simply cannot do what we have allowed them to do for over 200 years.

a. This not only stands for Trump V. The United States, but as well all rulings the supreme court has made with its unconstitutional power over its 200+ years. Including rulings regarding; citizens united, voting rights, etc.

2. and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

This line in the U.S. constitution article two, section four is in complete contradiction the supreme court ruling on its face making the ruling unconstitutional. As I previously said, the term high crimes is a reference to felonies and criminal proceedings and process.

a. This line means the President of the United States of America must be accountable to the justice system.

3. This Violates Congresses Powers of investigation, in accordance with Article I, Section 8, Clause 18: “Although the power of inquiry was not expressly provided for in the Constitution, it has nonetheless been acknowledged as an essential and appropriate auxiliary to the legislative function derived implicitly from Article I’s vesting of legislative Powers in the Congress.”

a. The president being Immune form investigations for actions and duties carried out in his day to day, would render the notion that the power of congress no longer has the power of oversight, and constitutes a violation to separation of powers.